Quantcast
Channel: Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2159

Christian Texts and History • Re: Was Detering wrong about Galatians being anti-proto-Acts, and not rather against Acts?

$
0
0
It seems just that the article "Die Gegner des Paulus im Galaterbrief" (introduced by the reference to the years 2005-2006) has been written after the commentary on Galatians (written in 2003).
The following writings must be distinguished

First phase - Galatians is, among other things, directed against Acts of the Apostles
Dissertation, 1992
Der gefälschte Paulus, 1995
Die Paulusbriefe in der Holländischen Radikalkritik, 1996
Die Gegner des Paulus im Galaterbrief, 2000
Erläuterungen zu "Der Galaterbrief in seiner ursprünglichen Gestalt", 2000 (You called that the "article from 2003")

Second phase - Galatians is directed against Judaizing oral tradition, Acts of the Apostles comes later
Die Gegner des Paulus - Judaistenthese 2. Jahrhundert, 2005-2006, published 2018 (You called that the "source of the my claim about what Detering thought on the anti-proto-Acts character of Galatians")
Elchasai und die Häresie des Kolosserbriefes, 2012

Ultimately, Hermann may no longer have a clear opinion on the question of whether Paul's letters should be dated before or after the canonical gospels. I suspect that he simply wasn't really interested in it anymore because it was no longer his topic.

Statistics: Posted by Kunigunde Kreuzerin — Sat Dec 21, 2024 6:46 am



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2159

Trending Articles