Quantcast
Channel: Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2044

Christian Texts and History • Was the polemic against James originally a polemic against the anti-demiurgism?

$
0
0
Evidence for an anti-demiurgist tradition about James:
  • 1. James is highly praised in the Gospel of Thomas.
  • The Gospel of Thomas is a Naassene text.
  • Mlinssen may disagree, but afterall the Gospel of Thomas is in the anti-demiurgist field, or how he (or the mythicist Georges Ory before him) calls it, 'Chrestianity'.
Someone has speculated that Paul was Simon Magus and was doubled in a Saul of Tarsus. If this was true, then one would expect in the interpolated epistles a conflict between Paul and Simon Magus, contra factum that it is not there. We find at contrary the conflict between James and Paul, with James reduced to a judaizing icon.
Hegesippus also casts James as a judaizing icon: he is Just in virtue of the his radical observance of the Law, hence making virtually James a "brother of Jesus" according to the same rules given by Jesus:

Whoever does God's will is my brother and sister and mother.”

(Mark 3:35)

..only with a variant: the "God's will" is for Hegesippus the Law given by YHWH, implying that the supreme god is YHWH.

In *Ev, on which Mark is based, there are not really carnal brothers of Jesus, but only mere tempting hearsay about their presumed presence there out. And surely for Marcion the observance of the 'God's will' able to make one a 'brother of Jesus' is not the radical observance of the Torah, but the more radical antinomianism.

Hence I am assuming the following course of events:

1. James was the perfect anti-demiurgist, hence the high praise of him in the Gospel of Thomas.

2. the Judaized Jesus had to be an enemy of James, just as the anti-demiurgist James had to consider a judaized Jesus as one "out of himself".

3. The original rivalry was between the Judaizers and the anti-demiurgist James.

4. Given the extreme utility, for Judaizers, of introducing a carnal brother for Jesus, then the Judaizers judaized James himself in the role of brother of the Judaized Jesus.

5. The memory of the radical rivalry between the Judaizers and the anti-demiurgist James couldn't be eclipsed, so it was transformed in a partial rivalry between the gentilizing Paul (and Jesus) and the now judaized James.

6.
The anti-demiurgist James was replaced by the anti-demiurgist (invented) Simon Magus.

7. the anti-demiurgist Mariamne was replaced by the anti-demiurgist (invented) Helen.

In short, the witness of the original anti-demiurgism, i.e. James from the Gospel of Thomas, would have been transformed in the witness of the more conservative tribal ebionism: James the Just per the Torah. And even more than that, in the carnal brother of Jesus.
  • Now, if Stuart is right somewhere in this forum to point out that 'Zebedee' is the allegory of YHWH, then James was removed from YHWH (as the evangelist would be saying us) and given again to the Unknown God.

Statistics: Posted by Giuseppe — Thu Jan 25, 2024 6:14 am



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2044

Trending Articles