What is most problematic in Klinghardt's reconstruction are philological issues. Some time ago I bought his monograph in the online version so that I could talk to biblical scholars and philologists with whom I shared these 1,400 pages of reconstruction.
Klinghardt introduces another ghost-writer who is to use specific, unusual linguistic constructions.
I love his downright "engineering" analysis and reconstruction, but it's not my voice that's important. He must convince philologists.
There is also a new doctoral thesis available online. In Polish, but that's not a problem now.
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publicat ... a2e291e63f
Klinghardt introduces another ghost-writer who is to use specific, unusual linguistic constructions.
I love his downright "engineering" analysis and reconstruction, but it's not my voice that's important. He must convince philologists.
There is also a new doctoral thesis available online. In Polish, but that's not a problem now.
https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/entities/publicat ... a2e291e63f
Statistics: Posted by JarekS — Tue Apr 09, 2024 8:22 pm