A question I have is the church sez that the only complete copy of the Didache is in Codex Hierosolymitanus, which worries me because Tischendorf visited the library where it was "found" not long before it was "found". Yet there seems to be a complete Didache in Whiston's AC as book 7.
What text was Whiston translating, and how does its Didache differ from the Codex Hierosolymitanus one?
There have often been concerns raised about the Codex Hierosolymitanus.
I don't think his early speculations about the Greek players pushing a western liberal NWO agenda are accurate. I wouldn't want to underplay the fact that Tischendorf was given a private audience with the Pope *before* he found Sinaiticus, that Ste. Catherines was silent about - or participated in the fraud - and that the Jerusalem Patriach gave Tichendendorf access to its library just before they "discovered" the Codex Hierosolymitanus. That's as large an eccumenical scale as it gets.
The Bryennios fortuitous discovery has been questioned.
One example of concern discuses the Codex and also Sinaiticus.
The James Donaldson section is here:
viewtopic.php?p=21644#p21644
I think the possible connection of Tischendorf and Codex Hierosolymitanus is a new one, raised by you.
As to the Whiston Didache, and raising the question whether that could be a source for the Codex Hierosolymitanus, that would take some checking.
Statistics: Posted by Steven Avery — Tue Jan 02, 2024 11:25 pm