I actually wanted to mention something else in this threadCompared to the synoptic gospels, it seems unusual that Matthew is mentioned alongside Simon Peter in GThomas 13, who otherwise only plays a narrative role in the gospels as a tax collector.
...
However, this juxtaposition of Simon Peter and Matthew becomes understandable against the background of the proto-Catholic reception of GMark and GMatthew.
...
In GThomas 13, "Simon Peter" represents the Gospel of Mark how the proto-Catholics saw it.

imho Melissa Harl Sellew interpreted that technique very nicely ("Reading Jesus in the Desert: The Gospel of Thomas Meets the Apophthegmata Patrum")
Thomas seeks to project its readers back into a time and place of uncertain stability – an unspecified location where ‘the living Jesus’ speaks, and a shifting group of largely nameless disciples approaches to listen and question him. Just as nearly all the statements in Thomas are introduced without explicit connection to their neighboring logia but merely with a simple phrase like “Jesus said …” (ⲡⲉϫⲉ ⲓ︤ⲥ︥ ϫⲉ-)
...
Thomas prefers to present the words … with a minimum of narrative dressing, a compositional strategy that compels or enables the reader to ‘hear’ the words in his or her own context, unbounded by historical constraints of ‘original’ time and place.
...
The literary design of the Gospel of Thomas, for its part, is well suited to function as a spiritual guidebook. Here we lack the framing of the teachings of Jesus within a biographical narrative familiar from the New Testament gospels, which tell his story punctuated with geographical and chronological signposts.
...
The sayings challenge, puzzle, sometimes even provide conflicting information about a given subject, and in so confronting the readers and hearers force them to create in their own minds the place where all the elements fit together.
...
The Gospel of Thomas stresses the values of solitude and autonomy over community and subordination, and it does so most decisively. Leaders and leadership are disparaged, while singleness and the solitary state are championed.
...
Thomas prefers to present the words … with a minimum of narrative dressing, a compositional strategy that compels or enables the reader to ‘hear’ the words in his or her own context, unbounded by historical constraints of ‘original’ time and place.
...
The literary design of the Gospel of Thomas, for its part, is well suited to function as a spiritual guidebook. Here we lack the framing of the teachings of Jesus within a biographical narrative familiar from the New Testament gospels, which tell his story punctuated with geographical and chronological signposts.
...
The sayings challenge, puzzle, sometimes even provide conflicting information about a given subject, and in so confronting the readers and hearers force them to create in their own minds the place where all the elements fit together.
...
The Gospel of Thomas stresses the values of solitude and autonomy over community and subordination, and it does so most decisively. Leaders and leadership are disparaged, while singleness and the solitary state are championed.
GThomas presents the living voice of Jesus and it is directed against hierarchical groups in which overseers set rules for the members. A good tip could therefore be that GThomas may also have been directed against Papias and the other proto-Catholics.
Papias | GThomas |
"Exposition of the Sayings of the Lord" | "The secret sayings which the living Jesus spoke" |
Just as the Elders teached … | Jesus said ... |
And the Elder John said ... | Jesus said ... |
That makes sense - right?

Statistics: Posted by Kunigunde Kreuzerin — Thu Feb 29, 2024 11:14 am