There are more interesting additions here. From BeDuhn:
In the Gospel of Luke v37 is really the only other direct claim from Luke 3-23 of Jesus explicitly fulfilling prophecy. The witnesses of Marcion's Gospel indicates that this was not present in the *Ev, and when you look at v37 in Luke, it also appears to be a late addition.
So really, the only claims of Jesus "fulfilling prophecy" in Luke are in Luke 1-2, Luke 24 and this one passage in Luke 22, which adds the same claim that is added to Mark 15 during the Crucifixion.
Thus, Luke/*Ev does indeed seem witness to an earlier narrative in which there is no claim here of Jesus "fulfilling prophecy".
So this appears to indicate a systematic effort of editors to modify these narratives in a homogeneous way across the Gospels to indicate that Jesus had "fulfilled prophecy".
This further supports the conclusion that Mark 14:49 is revision to the earlier narrative that was made in the presence of the other Gospels, namely Matthew.
It looks in this case like Both Mark and Luke were being conformed to Matthew here.
Matthew, I think, was derived from proto-Luke, with canonical Luke be conformed back to canonical Matthew. So there are circular references between Luke and Matthew.
Omission: Luke 22.35–37 was absent from the Evangelion, according to
Epiphanius, Scholion 64.
Luke 22.38–40 is unattested. As a continuation of the certainly absent vv.
35–37, v. 38 probably was also absent, particularly since armed disciples
would have been useful to cite against Marcion’s pacifism.
Epiphanius, Scholion 64.
Luke 22.38–40 is unattested. As a continuation of the certainly absent vv.
35–37, v. 38 probably was also absent, particularly since armed disciples
would have been useful to cite against Marcion’s pacifism.
In the Gospel of Luke v37 is really the only other direct claim from Luke 3-23 of Jesus explicitly fulfilling prophecy. The witnesses of Marcion's Gospel indicates that this was not present in the *Ev, and when you look at v37 in Luke, it also appears to be a late addition.
So really, the only claims of Jesus "fulfilling prophecy" in Luke are in Luke 1-2, Luke 24 and this one passage in Luke 22, which adds the same claim that is added to Mark 15 during the Crucifixion.
Thus, Luke/*Ev does indeed seem witness to an earlier narrative in which there is no claim here of Jesus "fulfilling prophecy".
So this appears to indicate a systematic effort of editors to modify these narratives in a homogeneous way across the Gospels to indicate that Jesus had "fulfilled prophecy".
This further supports the conclusion that Mark 14:49 is revision to the earlier narrative that was made in the presence of the other Gospels, namely Matthew.
It looks in this case like Both Mark and Luke were being conformed to Matthew here.
Matthew, I think, was derived from proto-Luke, with canonical Luke be conformed back to canonical Matthew. So there are circular references between Luke and Matthew.
Statistics: Posted by rgprice — Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:18 pm