Kunigunde, I value very much your opinion on this point. Since I recognize that the marcionite priority has serious problems in explaining the titulus crucis, have you a cogent explanation of it under the Markan priority that is not the Bermejo-Rubio's explanation (i.e. that the rebel Jesus advanced claims to the kingdom of Israel and the titulus parodied deliberately a such claim)?The „seditious material“ is not found in deeper archaeological layers of the text, but is found at the "final editing stage", as source critics would say. Carrier demonstrated this very well for the two swords story.
Statistics: Posted by Giuseppe — Mon Feb 05, 2024 5:18 am