Tertullian believed that the gospel he knew as Luke was the original version. Fundamentalists today believe that the gospel they know as Luke was written by a dude called Luke. Why couldn't Tertullian over 18 centuries ago? The issue for the relevant pundits is about tradition, not history.I've been thinking about this for thirty years. My conclusions are simple.but not the Marcion of Tertullian's response
1. the Marcionite gospel wasn't Luke.
2. Tertullian says its Luke.
3. How to reconcile this?
Statistics: Posted by spin — Tue Dec 24, 2024 10:16 am