That article on Paul and Apollonius was published without my permission. The writing is mine but not permission to publish it.
On 9/24/23 I wrote R. Price submitting a paper I DID want published, making an important case from Nabataean materials for the existence of a heretofore-unrecognized reign of an Aretas V in the Nabataean kinglist ca. 69-70 CE, and proposing that could be the "Aretas the king" referred to in 2 Cor 11:32. In that email below my signature my email had, "----- suggested I send a copy of this paper (attached) to you, which is a rough outline of an argument that the christian apostle Paul and Apollonius of Tyana represent independent tradition trajectories from a common origin", but I did not include the Apollonius paper in that email.
On 9/25/23 Price accepted my Aretas V paper--the crafted one I did want published and had submitted for that purpose: "Esteemed Greg, Thanks so much for this wonderful paper! Not being a complete fool, I certainly do want to publish it! It will be the centerpiece of the issue after next! It is a great honor!"
Price added in that email, "Is your paper on Paul as Apollonius available? I'd dearly love to see it!"
On 9/25/23 I replied with an email with the Paul as Apollonius paper attachment, "Attached is my paper outlining (a "prologemenon") an argument that Paul was Apollonius."
On 9/26/23 Price replied, "Wow! May I publish this one, too?"
On 9/27/23 I replied to Price: "I am reluctant to publish the Apollonius one as it stands, because so much need[s] to be supported, argued, and so forth. As it stands it is more of an outline for a book, and it covers such a range with many points that need to be backed up and supported. But after the Aretas V, which is an important one, is published, kindly by you, I could work up something revised from that piece for an article for JHC. Or make a try at a rewritten version of the present article if it seems that can be done short of a book."
No communication from me since altered that status in any way--no permission to publish the Apollonius paper, no further communication to me about it, I was not told it was going to be published. In a recent amicable inquiry from me regarding the Aretas paper which is accepted for publication and is in the pipeline for publication, I asked and Price assured me I would receive a proof of that article before it goes into print in the next issue of JHC after this one which was imminent. No mention of the Apollonius paper.
Therefore I was surprised to see today that my Apollonius article was published without my permission or knowledge. I received no notice or advance proof of it, and only learned of its publication today from reading this forum notice that it has been published.
On 9/24/23 I wrote R. Price submitting a paper I DID want published, making an important case from Nabataean materials for the existence of a heretofore-unrecognized reign of an Aretas V in the Nabataean kinglist ca. 69-70 CE, and proposing that could be the "Aretas the king" referred to in 2 Cor 11:32. In that email below my signature my email had, "----- suggested I send a copy of this paper (attached) to you, which is a rough outline of an argument that the christian apostle Paul and Apollonius of Tyana represent independent tradition trajectories from a common origin", but I did not include the Apollonius paper in that email.
On 9/25/23 Price accepted my Aretas V paper--the crafted one I did want published and had submitted for that purpose: "Esteemed Greg, Thanks so much for this wonderful paper! Not being a complete fool, I certainly do want to publish it! It will be the centerpiece of the issue after next! It is a great honor!"
Price added in that email, "Is your paper on Paul as Apollonius available? I'd dearly love to see it!"
On 9/25/23 I replied with an email with the Paul as Apollonius paper attachment, "Attached is my paper outlining (a "prologemenon") an argument that Paul was Apollonius."
On 9/26/23 Price replied, "Wow! May I publish this one, too?"
On 9/27/23 I replied to Price: "I am reluctant to publish the Apollonius one as it stands, because so much need[s] to be supported, argued, and so forth. As it stands it is more of an outline for a book, and it covers such a range with many points that need to be backed up and supported. But after the Aretas V, which is an important one, is published, kindly by you, I could work up something revised from that piece for an article for JHC. Or make a try at a rewritten version of the present article if it seems that can be done short of a book."
No communication from me since altered that status in any way--no permission to publish the Apollonius paper, no further communication to me about it, I was not told it was going to be published. In a recent amicable inquiry from me regarding the Aretas paper which is accepted for publication and is in the pipeline for publication, I asked and Price assured me I would receive a proof of that article before it goes into print in the next issue of JHC after this one which was imminent. No mention of the Apollonius paper.
Therefore I was surprised to see today that my Apollonius article was published without my permission or knowledge. I received no notice or advance proof of it, and only learned of its publication today from reading this forum notice that it has been published.
Statistics: Posted by gdoudna — Fri Oct 04, 2024 6:13 pm
